<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 507 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94793</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the product under Chapter Heading 52.06/52.07, determining it as water-proofed fabrics rather than impregnated textiles. The Department&#039;s demand for Central Excise Duty was dismissed due to the respondents&#039; eligibility for exemption as a registered SSI Unit. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts and ruled in favor of the respondents, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal and upholding the initial order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 507 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94793</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the product under Chapter Heading 52.06/52.07, determining it as water-proofed fabrics rather than impregnated textiles. The Department&#039;s demand for Central Excise Duty was dismissed due to the respondents&#039; eligibility for exemption as a registered SSI Unit. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts and ruled in favor of the respondents, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal and upholding the initial order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>