<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 504 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the classification of the product Penetrator 4893 under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The order-in-original classifying it under chapter 34 was upheld, with the Tribunal emphasizing the decision in favor of the respondents on both merits and limitation issues. The Tribunal found no suppression by the respondents and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, disposing of the cross objection filed by the respondents accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:49:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 504 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the classification of the product Penetrator 4893 under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The order-in-original classifying it under chapter 34 was upheld, with the Tribunal emphasizing the decision in favor of the respondents on both merits and limitation issues. The Tribunal found no suppression by the respondents and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, disposing of the cross objection filed by the respondents accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>