https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94788 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, confirming the duty demand on finished products for the remaining period not in question and reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant. The penalty was deemed not imposable on the other appellants due to insufficient evidence of their involvement in the alleged violations. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation was not applicable as the department was aware of the appellant's simultaneous availing of notifications 101/66 and 217/86. en-us Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:45:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94788 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, confirming the duty demand on finished products for the remaining period not in question and reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant. The penalty was deemed not imposable on the other appellants due to insufficient evidence of their involvement in the alleged violations. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation was not applicable as the department was aware of the appellant's simultaneous availing of notifications 101/66 and 217/86. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94788