<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 559 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94786</link>
    <description>An adjudication passed in breach of binding remand directions cannot be sustained where the Tribunal had required physical inspection of the furnace with technical assistance and a fresh decision after giving the appellants an effective chance to rebut the technical material. The authority instead relied on technical literature and the existing record without carrying out the directed inspection or providing expert assistance and rebuttal. That departure from the earlier instructions rendered the order unsustainable, so it was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:36:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 559 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94786</link>
      <description>An adjudication passed in breach of binding remand directions cannot be sustained where the Tribunal had required physical inspection of the furnace with technical assistance and a fresh decision after giving the appellants an effective chance to rebut the technical material. The authority instead relied on technical literature and the existing record without carrying out the directed inspection or providing expert assistance and rebuttal. That departure from the earlier instructions rendered the order unsustainable, so it was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>