https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94783 The request to stay the Commissioner's order permitting reshipment of goods was rejected because the goods had already been sold and were not available when the show cause notice and the order were passed. The order was also based on the view that the goods were not liable to confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, as they were covered by Open General Licence at the time of shipment. The possibility that related writ proceedings might succeed and render the appeal infructuous did not justify stay. The reshipment direction was outside the scope of the departmental appeal under Section 129D, and the stay application was dismissed. en-us Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:27:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94783 The request to stay the Commissioner's order permitting reshipment of goods was rejected because the goods had already been sold and were not available when the show cause notice and the order were passed. The order was also based on the view that the goods were not liable to confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, as they were covered by Open General Licence at the time of shipment. The possibility that related writ proceedings might succeed and render the appeal infructuous did not justify stay. The reshipment direction was outside the scope of the departmental appeal under Section 129D, and the stay application was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94783