<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 320 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94769</link>
    <description>Carbide sludge was treated as waste arising in the course of manufacture and not as a commercially marketable product. The Tribunal applied its earlier finding that carbide sludge was not marketable in the ordinary sense, and held that marketability is a necessary element for excisability. As the product lacked marketability, it was not chargeable to central excise duty, and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 320 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94769</link>
      <description>Carbide sludge was treated as waste arising in the course of manufacture and not as a commercially marketable product. The Tribunal applied its earlier finding that carbide sludge was not marketable in the ordinary sense, and held that marketability is a necessary element for excisability. As the product lacked marketability, it was not chargeable to central excise duty, and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>