<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 329 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94750</link>
    <description>A rubber-based cement/adhesive made from rubber dissolved in organic solvent was treated as a prepared adhesive rather than compounded rubber for Central Excise Tariff purposes. The product&#039;s adhesive character and suitability for tyre retreading were decisive, and technical literature showed that rubber-based adhesives need not contain resin. The exclusion and explanatory notes, together with earlier Tribunal rulings on similar products, supported classification under Heading 35.06. The absence of resin was not determinative because resin is only an optional ingredient in rubber-based adhesives, so classification under Heading 40.05 was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 15:27:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 329 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94750</link>
      <description>A rubber-based cement/adhesive made from rubber dissolved in organic solvent was treated as a prepared adhesive rather than compounded rubber for Central Excise Tariff purposes. The product&#039;s adhesive character and suitability for tyre retreading were decisive, and technical literature showed that rubber-based adhesives need not contain resin. The exclusion and explanatory notes, together with earlier Tribunal rulings on similar products, supported classification under Heading 35.06. The absence of resin was not determinative because resin is only an optional ingredient in rubber-based adhesives, so classification under Heading 40.05 was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>