<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (10) TMI 9 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94738</link>
    <description>Graduated excise-duty exemption for strawboard manufacturers below a production threshold was treated as a valid fiscal classification where it protected smaller units from competition and supported national production. Article 14 permits wider latitude in taxation; mathematical equality is unnecessary if an intelligible differentia bears a rational nexus to the measure&#039;s object. The classification was not shown to be hostile or arbitrary. Exemption power was traced to the rule-making framework and Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944; publication in the Official Gazette satisfied the applicable requirement, and non-laying before Parliament did not invalidate the notification. The exemption notification remained valid and the writ challenges failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (10) TMI 9 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94738</link>
      <description>Graduated excise-duty exemption for strawboard manufacturers below a production threshold was treated as a valid fiscal classification where it protected smaller units from competition and supported national production. Article 14 permits wider latitude in taxation; mathematical equality is unnecessary if an intelligible differentia bears a rational nexus to the measure&#039;s object. The classification was not shown to be hostile or arbitrary. Exemption power was traced to the rule-making framework and Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944; publication in the Official Gazette satisfied the applicable requirement, and non-laying before Parliament did not invalidate the notification. The exemption notification remained valid and the writ challenges failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>