<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 368 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed that the question of law proposed in the applications be referred to the Gujarat High Court, and instructed the registry to prepare and forward the statement of facts. The operative effect was to place the stated legal question before the High Court for consideration through the reference procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:33:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 368 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed that the question of law proposed in the applications be referred to the Gujarat High Court, and instructed the registry to prepare and forward the statement of facts. The operative effect was to place the stated legal question before the High Court for consideration through the reference procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>