https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94713 The Tribunal held that the appellants had shown a prima facie case for interim protection because the adjudicating authority had failed to consider an earlier order in the appellants' own case that had been placed before it. That earlier order had treated blended cotton yarn as cotton yarn for the relevant tariff note and exemption notifications, making the present dispute prima facie covered by the same reasoning. On that basis, the Tribunal granted unconditional stay and dispensed with pre-deposit of duty and penalty. en-us Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:13:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94713 The Tribunal held that the appellants had shown a prima facie case for interim protection because the adjudicating authority had failed to consider an earlier order in the appellants' own case that had been placed before it. That earlier order had treated blended cotton yarn as cotton yarn for the relevant tariff note and exemption notifications, making the present dispute prima facie covered by the same reasoning. On that basis, the Tribunal granted unconditional stay and dispensed with pre-deposit of duty and penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94713