https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94695 The Tribunal granted interim stay of the impugned orders because the dispute on duty liability for goods supplied under warranty or replacement was identical to an issue already pending before the Supreme Court, where operation of an earlier final order had been stayed. On that basis, it restrained the Department from taking recovery action for the disputed duties relating to supplies made under warranty/replacement during 1-1-1991 to 31-12-1997. The relief was confined to preserving the status quo pending adjudication of the same substantive question by the higher forum. en-us Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94695 The Tribunal granted interim stay of the impugned orders because the dispute on duty liability for goods supplied under warranty or replacement was identical to an issue already pending before the Supreme Court, where operation of an earlier final order had been stayed. On that basis, it restrained the Department from taking recovery action for the disputed duties relating to supplies made under warranty/replacement during 1-1-1991 to 31-12-1997. The relief was confined to preserving the status quo pending adjudication of the same substantive question by the higher forum. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94695