https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94686 The writ petition was not entertained because an adequate and efficacious departmental appeal was available and had not been pursued in time, so the writ court declined to exercise its jurisdiction. The jurisdictional challenge to the penalty order also failed, as the order had been passed after due authorisation by the Reserve Bank of India, leaving no sustainable defect in the authority's power to act. The petition was therefore rejected on the combined grounds of alternative remedy and absence of jurisdictional infirmity. en-us Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:38:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94686 The writ petition was not entertained because an adequate and efficacious departmental appeal was available and had not been pursued in time, so the writ court declined to exercise its jurisdiction. The jurisdictional challenge to the penalty order also failed, as the order had been passed after due authorisation by the Reserve Bank of India, leaving no sustainable defect in the authority's power to act. The petition was therefore rejected on the combined grounds of alternative remedy and absence of jurisdictional infirmity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94686