<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 475 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94635</link>
    <description>In stay proceedings, the extent of pre-deposit may be moderated by balancing prima facie merits against financial hardship. Admissions and statements indicated receipt of raw materials and processing into motor vehicle components and spares, while the record also showed a small turnover, an earlier deposit, and an unexamined valuation plea. Complete waiver was therefore not justified, but insisting on the full demand would cause undue hardship. A substantial partial deposit was ordered to secure the appeal, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for disposal on merits after compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:30:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 475 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94635</link>
      <description>In stay proceedings, the extent of pre-deposit may be moderated by balancing prima facie merits against financial hardship. Admissions and statements indicated receipt of raw materials and processing into motor vehicle components and spares, while the record also showed a small turnover, an earlier deposit, and an unexamined valuation plea. Complete waiver was therefore not justified, but insisting on the full demand would cause undue hardship. A substantial partial deposit was ordered to secure the appeal, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for disposal on merits after compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>