<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 539 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94634</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the expenditure on service engineers should not be included in the assessable value. Consequently, the demand for duty, penalty, and interest was deemed unjustified. The principal-to-principal relationship between the appellant and the dealers, as well as the optional nature of the service engineers&#039; services, were pivotal in this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 539 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94634</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the expenditure on service engineers should not be included in the assessable value. Consequently, the demand for duty, penalty, and interest was deemed unjustified. The principal-to-principal relationship between the appellant and the dealers, as well as the optional nature of the service engineers&#039; services, were pivotal in this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>