<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 435 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94612</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for reevaluation by the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the importance of legal compliance and procedural fairness. The judgment addressed duty evasion, exemption notifications, goods classification, jurisdictional challenges, assessable value inclusion, and penalty imposition, requiring a fresh review to safeguard the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 435 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94612</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for reevaluation by the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the importance of legal compliance and procedural fairness. The judgment addressed duty evasion, exemption notifications, goods classification, jurisdictional challenges, assessable value inclusion, and penalty imposition, requiring a fresh review to safeguard the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>