<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 340 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94607</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of seized excisable goods and the truck, along with the demand of Central Excise Duty based on electricity consumption. Penalties imposed on the company, its Managing Director, Director, and Driver were also upheld. The Tribunal found the actions of clandestinely removing goods and suppressing production to be grave offenses warranting penalties. The appeals were rejected, affirming the impugned order in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:41:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 340 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94607</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of seized excisable goods and the truck, along with the demand of Central Excise Duty based on electricity consumption. Penalties imposed on the company, its Managing Director, Director, and Driver were also upheld. The Tribunal found the actions of clandestinely removing goods and suppressing production to be grave offenses warranting penalties. The appeals were rejected, affirming the impugned order in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>