<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 473 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94600</link>
    <description>Manual assembly of generating sets without power did not defeat exemption under Notification No. 179/77-C.E. merely because the alternators used in the sets were manufactured with power, and captively consumed alternators remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 118/75-C.E. Allegations of clandestine manufacture were sustained where alternators bore missing serial numbers and the assessee produced no records explaining the omissions. In job work cases, Notification No. 119/75-C.E. did not alter the position that the assessee remained the manufacturer of the finished generating sets, so the full value of the final product was relevant for clearance computation. By contrast, the department failed to prove that buyers were related persons for valuation purposes, so that enhancement was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:21:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 473 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94600</link>
      <description>Manual assembly of generating sets without power did not defeat exemption under Notification No. 179/77-C.E. merely because the alternators used in the sets were manufactured with power, and captively consumed alternators remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 118/75-C.E. Allegations of clandestine manufacture were sustained where alternators bore missing serial numbers and the assessee produced no records explaining the omissions. In job work cases, Notification No. 119/75-C.E. did not alter the position that the assessee remained the manufacturer of the finished generating sets, so the full value of the final product was relevant for clearance computation. By contrast, the department failed to prove that buyers were related persons for valuation purposes, so that enhancement was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>