<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 262 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94599</link>
    <description>An SSI unit that had already filed the required declaration of inputs and final products was not required to submit a fresh declaration under Rule 57G merely because it crossed the exemption threshold, so long as the inputs remained unchanged. The operative principle is that crossing the clearance value limit alone does not justify insisting on a new declaration for availing Modvat credit where the earlier declaration already covered the same inputs. On that basis, denial of Modvat credit was held unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:18:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 262 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94599</link>
      <description>An SSI unit that had already filed the required declaration of inputs and final products was not required to submit a fresh declaration under Rule 57G merely because it crossed the exemption threshold, so long as the inputs remained unchanged. The operative principle is that crossing the clearance value limit alone does not justify insisting on a new declaration for availing Modvat credit where the earlier declaration already covered the same inputs. On that basis, denial of Modvat credit was held unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>