<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported synthetic waste under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Department failed to provide evidence supporting the classification under Tariff Item 18-IV, and legal precedents favored classification under Tariff Item 68. The appeal against the Collector (Appeals) order was rejected, affirming the classification under Tariff Item 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:52:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported synthetic waste under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Department failed to provide evidence supporting the classification under Tariff Item 18-IV, and legal precedents favored classification under Tariff Item 68. The appeal against the Collector (Appeals) order was rejected, affirming the classification under Tariff Item 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>