https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94580 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's petition, emphasizing the lack of evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal and invisible loss. It highlighted the importance of substantial proof and legal precedents in determining the validity of claims related to production losses. The decision underscored the significance of factual findings over legal questions and concluded that the benefit could not be granted without corroborative evidence. en-us Tue, 28 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:39:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94580 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's petition, emphasizing the lack of evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal and invisible loss. It highlighted the importance of substantial proof and legal precedents in determining the validity of claims related to production losses. The decision underscored the significance of factual findings over legal questions and concluded that the benefit could not be granted without corroborative evidence. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94580