<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 410 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94562</link>
    <description>Where exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. is admitted, an approved classification list does not prevent recovery of differential duty if it incorrectly states the applicable rate. The text distinguishes a demand that merely corrects the duty rate shown in the approved list from one that challenges the approval of the classification list itself. Because the classification of the goods and availability of the exemption were not disputed, the wrong rate could be corrected by demand of the differential duty. The principle protecting an approved classification list applies only when the approval itself is under challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:44:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 410 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94562</link>
      <description>Where exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. is admitted, an approved classification list does not prevent recovery of differential duty if it incorrectly states the applicable rate. The text distinguishes a demand that merely corrects the duty rate shown in the approved list from one that challenges the approval of the classification list itself. Because the classification of the goods and availability of the exemption were not disputed, the wrong rate could be corrected by demand of the differential duty. The principle protecting an approved classification list applies only when the approval itself is under challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>