<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 431 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94556</link>
    <description>Modvat credit taken on the basis of a dealer&#039;s invoice could not be denied where the assessee received goods under a proper invoice and had no means to verify any mistake in the dealer&#039;s issuance of that invoice. Any error lay with the dealer, and the proper course was departmental action against the dealer. In the absence of any contravention by the assessee, penalty could not be sustained. The assessee was therefore entitled to credit and relief from penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 431 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94556</link>
      <description>Modvat credit taken on the basis of a dealer&#039;s invoice could not be denied where the assessee received goods under a proper invoice and had no means to verify any mistake in the dealer&#039;s issuance of that invoice. Any error lay with the dealer, and the proper course was departmental action against the dealer. In the absence of any contravention by the assessee, penalty could not be sustained. The assessee was therefore entitled to credit and relief from penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>