<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 386 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94544</link>
    <description>The appellate authority upheld the importer&#039;s claim that Black Cumin should be classified as a crude drug under the Import and Export Policy, overturning the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) decision that classified it as consumer goods. The judgment emphasized the significance of adhering to policy guidelines for consistent classification of imported goods under the Open General License, ensuring compliance with regulatory frameworks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:35:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 386 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94544</link>
      <description>The appellate authority upheld the importer&#039;s claim that Black Cumin should be classified as a crude drug under the Import and Export Policy, overturning the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) decision that classified it as consumer goods. The judgment emphasized the significance of adhering to policy guidelines for consistent classification of imported goods under the Open General License, ensuring compliance with regulatory frameworks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>