https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94542 The judgment focused on the compliance of a stay order under section 35F of the Central Excise Act. It highlighted the lack of proper consideration and absence of a personal hearing in the impugned order. The appellant's arguments regarding the inadequacy of the order in addressing evidence and requests were accepted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of granting a personal hearing before disposing of stay applications, citing relevant precedents. The appeal was allowed by remand, instructing the Commissioner (Appeals) to conduct a hearing with the appellant for a fair resolution in accordance with the law. en-us Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:25:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94542 The judgment focused on the compliance of a stay order under section 35F of the Central Excise Act. It highlighted the lack of proper consideration and absence of a personal hearing in the impugned order. The appellant's arguments regarding the inadequacy of the order in addressing evidence and requests were accepted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of granting a personal hearing before disposing of stay applications, citing relevant precedents. The appeal was allowed by remand, instructing the Commissioner (Appeals) to conduct a hearing with the appellant for a fair resolution in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94542