<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 415 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94504</link>
    <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly, so benefit cannot be extended to composite goods merely because they fall within a broad tariff heading. Radio sets with in-built sound recording and reproducing facilities were held not to answer the description &quot;radio sets including transistor sets&quot; under Notification No. 57/93-CE. Because the notification specifically limited the exemption to that description, the composite radio cassette type goods were treated as falling under the residual entry for &quot;all other goods&quot; under the same sub-heading. The result was that the exemption claim under Sl. No. 10(a) failed and the goods were correctly classified under Sl. No. 10(b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 415 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94504</link>
      <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly, so benefit cannot be extended to composite goods merely because they fall within a broad tariff heading. Radio sets with in-built sound recording and reproducing facilities were held not to answer the description &quot;radio sets including transistor sets&quot; under Notification No. 57/93-CE. Because the notification specifically limited the exemption to that description, the composite radio cassette type goods were treated as falling under the residual entry for &quot;all other goods&quot; under the same sub-heading. The result was that the exemption claim under Sl. No. 10(a) failed and the goods were correctly classified under Sl. No. 10(b).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>