<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 406 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94495</link>
    <description>In valuing goods cleared on job work basis, no separate addition for margin of profit was required where the disclosed labour charges already included that element. The dispute was limited to whether assessable value could be increased by a further 10% profit addition; the appellate authority accepted the assessee&#039;s position that profit was embedded in the labour charges. The Tribunal found no basis on the record to disturb that finding, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:38:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 406 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94495</link>
      <description>In valuing goods cleared on job work basis, no separate addition for margin of profit was required where the disclosed labour charges already included that element. The dispute was limited to whether assessable value could be increased by a further 10% profit addition; the appellate authority accepted the assessee&#039;s position that profit was embedded in the labour charges. The Tribunal found no basis on the record to disturb that finding, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>