<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 403 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94492</link>
    <description>Captively consumed goods were to be valued primarily on the basis of comparable goods under Rule 6(b)(i) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975, with reasonable adjustments for relevant differences such as material characteristics. Cost of production including profit applied only when value could not be determined under that clause. Because comparable goods were available and the assessment was made on that basis, the lower authority&#039;s valuation method was consistent with the rule and the Revenue&#039;s cost-based valuation approach was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:19:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 403 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94492</link>
      <description>Captively consumed goods were to be valued primarily on the basis of comparable goods under Rule 6(b)(i) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975, with reasonable adjustments for relevant differences such as material characteristics. Cost of production including profit applied only when value could not be determined under that clause. Because comparable goods were available and the assessment was made on that basis, the lower authority&#039;s valuation method was consistent with the rule and the Revenue&#039;s cost-based valuation approach was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>