<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 397 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94486</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded three appeals concerning the classification of &#039;Gulabjamun&#039; and consequent demands back to jurisdictional authorities due to unclear records and the need to apply relevant decisions. Despite the age of the matter, the Tribunal deemed it necessary in the interest of justice to grant the appellants an opportunity to present arguments before the adjudicating authority during fresh consideration. The jurisdictional authorities were instructed to re-examine the classification issue, with one case to be decided by the Commissioner of Central Excise. All three appeals were disposed of through remand, emphasizing the need for a thorough reconsideration of the classification issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:49:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 397 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94486</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded three appeals concerning the classification of &#039;Gulabjamun&#039; and consequent demands back to jurisdictional authorities due to unclear records and the need to apply relevant decisions. Despite the age of the matter, the Tribunal deemed it necessary in the interest of justice to grant the appellants an opportunity to present arguments before the adjudicating authority during fresh consideration. The jurisdictional authorities were instructed to re-examine the classification issue, with one case to be decided by the Commissioner of Central Excise. All three appeals were disposed of through remand, emphasizing the need for a thorough reconsideration of the classification issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>