https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94477 Mere non-entry of goods in RG-1 did not justify confiscation or penalty where the goods remained within the licensed factory, had not completed the manufacturing process, and there was no evidence of clandestine removal. The record showed that the goods were still unfinished and had not undergone all steps required to make them marketable as bulk drugs. In these circumstances, absence of RG-1 entry alone was insufficient to sustain excise confiscation or penalty, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief. en-us Thu, 18 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:14:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94477 Mere non-entry of goods in RG-1 did not justify confiscation or penalty where the goods remained within the licensed factory, had not completed the manufacturing process, and there was no evidence of clandestine removal. The record showed that the goods were still unfinished and had not undergone all steps required to make them marketable as bulk drugs. In these circumstances, absence of RG-1 entry alone was insufficient to sustain excise confiscation or penalty, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 18 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94477