https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94465 Cement sacks bearing the legend "A subsidiary of Grasim Industries Ltd." were treated as not using another person's brand name or trade mark where the appellant's own trade mark remained on the packaging and the legend merely described the holding company. Reading Notification No. 5/98 with its explanation, in line with the corresponding explanation under Notification No. 175/86-CE and prior Tribunal decisions, the absence of any monogram, alpha character, or other trade mark indication of another person meant the notification benefit was not lost. The demand and penalty were therefore set aside. en-us Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:34:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94465 Cement sacks bearing the legend "A subsidiary of Grasim Industries Ltd." were treated as not using another person's brand name or trade mark where the appellant's own trade mark remained on the packaging and the legend merely described the holding company. Reading Notification No. 5/98 with its explanation, in line with the corresponding explanation under Notification No. 175/86-CE and prior Tribunal decisions, the absence of any monogram, alpha character, or other trade mark indication of another person meant the notification benefit was not lost. The demand and penalty were therefore set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94465