<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 515 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94451</link>
    <description>Under Rule 57Q, capital goods for Modvat credit included machinery, plant, appliances and parts used in producing, processing or otherwise facilitating manufacturing, including items in temperature control, material handling, measuring and electrical systems where they met that description. Applying the Larger Bench view and Notifications Nos. 11/95 and 14/96, the Tribunal treated the disputed goods as generally eligible on that basis. It excluded vacuum cleaners and Protectomat from credit, and the claim relating to HDPE pipes was not pursued. The analysis thus shows a broad functional approach to capital goods eligibility, with item-specific exclusion where the goods did not satisfy the rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:54:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 515 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94451</link>
      <description>Under Rule 57Q, capital goods for Modvat credit included machinery, plant, appliances and parts used in producing, processing or otherwise facilitating manufacturing, including items in temperature control, material handling, measuring and electrical systems where they met that description. Applying the Larger Bench view and Notifications Nos. 11/95 and 14/96, the Tribunal treated the disputed goods as generally eligible on that basis. It excluded vacuum cleaners and Protectomat from credit, and the claim relating to HDPE pipes was not pursued. The analysis thus shows a broad functional approach to capital goods eligibility, with item-specific exclusion where the goods did not satisfy the rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>