<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 506 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of silver but allowed redemption for gold upon payment of a fine. Penalties were adjusted based on individual partner involvement. The partnership firm&#039;s appeal was deemed redundant as partners had already filed separate appeals. The decision was tailored to the specific circumstances and evidence of each case, resulting in the dismissal of one appeal and partial allowance of another.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:10:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 506 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of silver but allowed redemption for gold upon payment of a fine. Penalties were adjusted based on individual partner involvement. The partnership firm&#039;s appeal was deemed redundant as partners had already filed separate appeals. The decision was tailored to the specific circumstances and evidence of each case, resulting in the dismissal of one appeal and partial allowance of another.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>