<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 304 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94427</link>
    <description>Clandestine receipt, conversion and removal of M.S. billets was not proved because the transport records lacked proof of actual delivery, the cross-examination of transporters did not establish factory receipt, and the record did not show cogent evidence of unauthorised clearance. Deemed Modvat credit was held inadmissible once the billets were shown to be non-duty-paid, as the basis for such credit then disappeared. Penalty was sustained in principle for wrongful availment of credit but reduced as excessive on the facts, while confiscation of land, plant, building and machinery was set aside as unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:30:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 304 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94427</link>
      <description>Clandestine receipt, conversion and removal of M.S. billets was not proved because the transport records lacked proof of actual delivery, the cross-examination of transporters did not establish factory receipt, and the record did not show cogent evidence of unauthorised clearance. Deemed Modvat credit was held inadmissible once the billets were shown to be non-duty-paid, as the basis for such credit then disappeared. Penalty was sustained in principle for wrongful availment of credit but reduced as excessive on the facts, while confiscation of land, plant, building and machinery was set aside as unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>