<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 303 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the appeals to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh examination of the classification of Animal Feed Ingredient (AFI) cake, emphasizing the importance of scrutinizing the manufacturing process and relevant evidence. The decision highlighted the need for expert opinions to address the suppression of facts and extended period of demand concerns effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:28:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 303 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the appeals to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh examination of the classification of Animal Feed Ingredient (AFI) cake, emphasizing the importance of scrutinizing the manufacturing process and relevant evidence. The decision highlighted the need for expert opinions to address the suppression of facts and extended period of demand concerns effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>