<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 302 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94425</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed the denial of natural justice, quantification of duty evasion, existence of an undisclosed bank account, voluntary payments, prima facie case, and directives for deposit, waiver, and stay of penalties. The applicants failed to establish a strong case for denial of adequate opportunity despite claims of incomplete documentation. The judgment found that the applicants possessed necessary documents to show lesser duty payable but failed to do so effectively. The existence of an undisclosed bank account served as corroborative evidence against the applicants, reinforcing allegations of duty evasion. M/s. Myco Electricals (P) Ltd. was directed to deposit specified amounts towards confirmed duty, with penalties waived for minor noticees and a stay granted upon deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 302 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94425</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed the denial of natural justice, quantification of duty evasion, existence of an undisclosed bank account, voluntary payments, prima facie case, and directives for deposit, waiver, and stay of penalties. The applicants failed to establish a strong case for denial of adequate opportunity despite claims of incomplete documentation. The judgment found that the applicants possessed necessary documents to show lesser duty payable but failed to do so effectively. The existence of an undisclosed bank account served as corroborative evidence against the applicants, reinforcing allegations of duty evasion. M/s. Myco Electricals (P) Ltd. was directed to deposit specified amounts towards confirmed duty, with penalties waived for minor noticees and a stay granted upon deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>