https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94417 Exemption under Notification No. 175/86 was held available where aggregate clearances stayed within the prescribed limit, even though clearances under one chapter exceeded the chapter-wise threshold. The Tribunal treated its earlier interpretation as settled by consistent subsequent decisions and by the Supreme Court's rejection of the Department's challenge in connected proceedings, and held that the contrary view in Ramakrishna Engineering Works did not govern. On that basis, the Revenue's objection based on the chapter-wise limit failed and the exemption was allowed to stand. en-us Tue, 25 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:04:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94417 Exemption under Notification No. 175/86 was held available where aggregate clearances stayed within the prescribed limit, even though clearances under one chapter exceeded the chapter-wise threshold. The Tribunal treated its earlier interpretation as settled by consistent subsequent decisions and by the Supreme Court's rejection of the Department's challenge in connected proceedings, and held that the contrary view in Ramakrishna Engineering Works did not govern. On that basis, the Revenue's objection based on the chapter-wise limit failed and the exemption was allowed to stand. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94417