<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 360 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal recalled its final order dated 24-7-1998 following a disagreement between the Vice President and Member (J) regarding errors in the reliance on test reports and technical errors in the cause title and order number. The third member agreed with Member (J) that the order needed reconsideration. The Miscellaneous Application was allowed, and the appeals were fixed for re-hearing, emphasizing the importance of addressing objections and admitting evidence properly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 360 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal recalled its final order dated 24-7-1998 following a disagreement between the Vice President and Member (J) regarding errors in the reliance on test reports and technical errors in the cause title and order number. The third member agreed with Member (J) that the order needed reconsideration. The Miscellaneous Application was allowed, and the appeals were fixed for re-hearing, emphasizing the importance of addressing objections and admitting evidence properly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>