https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94406 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Assistant Commissioner for a fresh classification order, as fundamental factual disputes regarding the presence of potentiometer bridges in the recorders and the absence of clock or watch movements in the equipment under Chapter sub-heading 91.06 required further examination. The appellants' contentions on the components and operational methods of the items necessitated a detailed review to determine the correct classification, providing them with an opportunity to present their case effectively. en-us Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:34:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94406 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Assistant Commissioner for a fresh classification order, as fundamental factual disputes regarding the presence of potentiometer bridges in the recorders and the absence of clock or watch movements in the equipment under Chapter sub-heading 91.06 required further examination. The appellants' contentions on the components and operational methods of the items necessitated a detailed review to determine the correct classification, providing them with an opportunity to present their case effectively. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94406