https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94360 The Tribunal held that certain costs should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation, setting aside the demand for those costs and remanding for quantification based on labor cost. A jurisdictional dispute was acknowledged, but decisions were made on the case merits, leading to a remand for a fresh order. The Tribunal found merit in the department's case regarding duty liability determination, noting material facts suppression. The impugned order was set aside, and the case remanded for further proceedings, with confiscation and penalty imposed being set aside. en-us Fri, 15 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:28:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94360 The Tribunal held that certain costs should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation, setting aside the demand for those costs and remanding for quantification based on labor cost. A jurisdictional dispute was acknowledged, but decisions were made on the case merits, leading to a remand for a fresh order. The Tribunal found merit in the department's case regarding duty liability determination, noting material facts suppression. The impugned order was set aside, and the case remanded for further proceedings, with confiscation and penalty imposed being set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94360