<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 332 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94352</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalty on the Customs House Agent (CHA) for attempting to export goods without a valid APEDA Certificate based on substantial evidence of moving cargo without the certificate. The court found the CHA liable under Section 147(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, and reduced the penalty amount to Rs. 1 lakh, aligning it with the exporter&#039;s penalty. The penalty on the Manager was set aside, affirming the CHA&#039;s responsibility for the consequences and emphasizing the voluntary nature of the appellants&#039; statement as admissible evidence. The judgment clarified the limited applicability of the order to the present case only.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 332 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94352</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalty on the Customs House Agent (CHA) for attempting to export goods without a valid APEDA Certificate based on substantial evidence of moving cargo without the certificate. The court found the CHA liable under Section 147(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, and reduced the penalty amount to Rs. 1 lakh, aligning it with the exporter&#039;s penalty. The penalty on the Manager was set aside, affirming the CHA&#039;s responsibility for the consequences and emphasizing the voluntary nature of the appellants&#039; statement as admissible evidence. The judgment clarified the limited applicability of the order to the present case only.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>