<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94326</link>
    <description>Interim relief pending appeal was granted where the appellants sought dispensation of duty pre-deposit and stay of recovery on the basis of small-scale industry exemption and undue hardship. The Tribunal treated the facts as comparable to earlier orders in which unconditional stay had been allowed, and found no reason to depart from that approach. As a result, the duty deposit was dispensed with and the Revenue was restrained from pursuing recovery until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:31:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94326</link>
      <description>Interim relief pending appeal was granted where the appellants sought dispensation of duty pre-deposit and stay of recovery on the basis of small-scale industry exemption and undue hardship. The Tribunal treated the facts as comparable to earlier orders in which unconditional stay had been allowed, and found no reason to depart from that approach. As a result, the duty deposit was dispensed with and the Revenue was restrained from pursuing recovery until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>