<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 334 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94317</link>
    <description>An appellate order granting the respondents&#039; claim with consequential relief remained operative because no stay had been obtained, so implementation of that relief was directed. The Revenue&#039;s challenge also involved a dispute over the character of the goods, which was treated as sufficient ground to advance the matter. The request for consequential relief was accepted, and the appeal was listed for out-of-turn hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:52:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 334 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94317</link>
      <description>An appellate order granting the respondents&#039; claim with consequential relief remained operative because no stay had been obtained, so implementation of that relief was directed. The Revenue&#039;s challenge also involved a dispute over the character of the goods, which was treated as sufficient ground to advance the matter. The request for consequential relief was accepted, and the appeal was listed for out-of-turn hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>