<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 373 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94308</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Calcutta dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for condonation of delay in filing Cross Objection as the impugned order was in favor of the respondents, making the Cross Objection unnecessary. The Tribunal treated the Cross Objection as written submissions and held that the application for condonation of delay was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:22:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 373 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94308</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Calcutta dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for condonation of delay in filing Cross Objection as the impugned order was in favor of the respondents, making the Cross Objection unnecessary. The Tribunal treated the Cross Objection as written submissions and held that the application for condonation of delay was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>