https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94267 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the demand of duty on housings for capacitors. The Tribunal found that the allegation of suppression of facts by the appellants to evade duty payment was unfounded, as evidence showed that the Revenue was aware of the manufacturing activity. Consequently, the extended period of limitation for raising the duty demand was deemed unsustainable. The impugned order demanding duty and imposing a penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:28:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94267 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the demand of duty on housings for capacitors. The Tribunal found that the allegation of suppression of facts by the appellants to evade duty payment was unfounded, as evidence showed that the Revenue was aware of the manufacturing activity. Consequently, the extended period of limitation for raising the duty demand was deemed unsustainable. The impugned order demanding duty and imposing a penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94267