https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94265 Compliance with the Tribunal's earlier stay directions and grant of immunity under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 did not justify restoring the dismissed appeals. Although the appellant showed that the directed amount had been determined, paid and covered under the scheme, the Tribunal found that reopening the appeals would serve no practical purpose because any further proceeding would only result in dismissal as infructuous. The restoration applications were therefore dismissed. en-us Wed, 17 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:23:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94265 Compliance with the Tribunal's earlier stay directions and grant of immunity under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 did not justify restoring the dismissed appeals. Although the appellant showed that the directed amount had been determined, paid and covered under the scheme, the Tribunal found that reopening the appeals would serve no practical purpose because any further proceeding would only result in dismissal as infructuous. The restoration applications were therefore dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94265