https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94264 The High Court reviewed a Civil Misc. Writ Petition challenging an original order due to alleged errors regarding duty demand, limitation plea, and undue hardship. The Court acknowledged its power to review under Article 226, citing relevant Supreme Court decisions. While noting the Tribunal's findings, the Court found no significant error warranting review on the duty demand discrepancy. The Court allowed the petitioner to deposit a reduced amount in cash and provide additional security, with specified timelines and conditions. The review petition was disposed of with the modified order in place. en-us Wed, 03 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:20:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94264 The High Court reviewed a Civil Misc. Writ Petition challenging an original order due to alleged errors regarding duty demand, limitation plea, and undue hardship. The Court acknowledged its power to review under Article 226, citing relevant Supreme Court decisions. While noting the Tribunal's findings, the Court found no significant error warranting review on the duty demand discrepancy. The Court allowed the petitioner to deposit a reduced amount in cash and provide additional security, with specified timelines and conditions. The review petition was disposed of with the modified order in place. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94264