<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 424 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94246</link>
    <description>An appellate authority must consider the grounds raised in appeal before directing pre-deposit, and failure to do so breaches natural justice. Where the record shows a prima facie case for waiver, supported by a Board circular, a limitation plea, and a bona fide belief that the intermediate product was not dutiable, insistence on pre-deposit is unjustified. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision on merits without requiring pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:34:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 424 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94246</link>
      <description>An appellate authority must consider the grounds raised in appeal before directing pre-deposit, and failure to do so breaches natural justice. Where the record shows a prima facie case for waiver, supported by a Board circular, a limitation plea, and a bona fide belief that the intermediate product was not dutiable, insistence on pre-deposit is unjustified. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision on merits without requiring pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>