<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 470 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under the Customs Act. It found that the extended period of five years was unjustified as there was no evidence of deliberate suppression or fraud by the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely investigation and adherence to legal provisions in customs matters, ultimately granting consequential reliefs to the appellants due to the time-barred nature of the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 470 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under the Customs Act. It found that the extended period of five years was unjustified as there was no evidence of deliberate suppression or fraud by the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely investigation and adherence to legal provisions in customs matters, ultimately granting consequential reliefs to the appellants due to the time-barred nature of the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>