https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94205 A classification dispute over excise liability led the appellate forum to treat the existing deposit and bank guarantee as sufficient for stay purposes. Because a substantial amount had already been deposited and the penalty was prima facie contestable in a classification matter, no additional pre-deposit was considered necessary as a condition for hearing the appeal. Recovery of the remaining duty and penalty was therefore stayed at the interim stage. en-us Mon, 01 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:51:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94205 A classification dispute over excise liability led the appellate forum to treat the existing deposit and bank guarantee as sufficient for stay purposes. Because a substantial amount had already been deposited and the penalty was prima facie contestable in a classification matter, no additional pre-deposit was considered necessary as a condition for hearing the appeal. Recovery of the remaining duty and penalty was therefore stayed at the interim stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94205