<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 319 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming duty and imposing a penalty on the appellants for clandestine removal of excisable goods. The decision was based on discrepancies in recovery procedures, lack of tangible evidence, and rejected affidavits, leading to the benefit of doubt being given to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:41:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 319 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming duty and imposing a penalty on the appellants for clandestine removal of excisable goods. The decision was based on discrepancies in recovery procedures, lack of tangible evidence, and rejected affidavits, leading to the benefit of doubt being given to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>